Tuesday, 26 April 2011
Cultural Mosaic or Farce?
I, like every other Canadian, have been thoroughly educated to believe that Canada is a cultural mosaic. Our fifth, ninth and eleventh grade teachers proudly indoctrinated us into believing that unlike America we welcomed our cultural differences. But having just finished this years History class and with a Federal Election looming I have to question the legitimacy of this claim. Has Canada traditionally welcomed religious and ethnic minorities? Yes. Has it done so out of an unadulterated sense of goodwill? Absolutely not. In the 19th century Canada was a small, terrified country with America looming to the South. What is a country to do? Naturally, import whoever is willing to live in a frozen, ungoverned wasteland. Or in other words, who's going to be moving to 1800's "Canada". That's right, people who were coming from somewhere worse, that is groups that were being persecuted. This also set Canada down it's path of moral superiority. I think of all this because while I am proud of Canada as a bilingual country, as I have said before, and wish I spoke French, this all just seems a bit ridiculous to me. I will be working at the Election where I have been instructed to greet every voter with "Hello Bonjour", even though by far the majority of voters at my location will be English, German or some mix. In my area where Spanish and German far outweigh French speakers, do I really have to say "Bonjour" so that some voter in Quebec doesn't get mad? I support the French speaking areas of Canada in protecting their cultural identity. But if Canada wants to brag about it's cultural mosaic-ness, shouldn't we be protecting ALL cultural identities?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Language and politics make a strange cocktail. I think it's very tied with the idea of nationalism and economical power. This might be an echo of an echo of something that someone said about a cliche, but I have no other insight on the issue. If you have a bouyant economy and you're paying taxes to other federal communities and willing to break the bonds, that's when language will be used as an argument for independence. That's what happens in Catalonia, at least.
ReplyDeleteIn the cases where two official languages coexist, the debate just kindles. But in my opinion, I celebrate any gubernamental money spent on languages. Why? I think because it enriches the country and culture. This has its downside and it's when, as you said, there is an expectation from the government to know this language, falling into positive discrimination. Many people complain rightly about this.
I think it's far too complex an issue for me to talk about or even take sides. I'll just sneak into my lare and keep watching Youtube.
Well, my complaint is not that the government spends money on language, I support this whole heartedly. And I love French culture and think it enriches Canada but the problem, as it too often is with Canada is that the Government makes choices based on how cool it will make Canada look on the world stage. So being bilingual isn't about preserving French culture it's about-hey aren't we so much more hip than America? Isn't it time we as a nation grow up and stop trying to be better than America just because we can't be more powerful than them? Furthermore, if the Government wants to have a bilingual populace then how about implementing decent French programs in schools? Most of the people I know who took French in school can only say Bonjour and Merci.
ReplyDeleteTotally agree there, electoral interest in political action is no good.
ReplyDelete