Saturday, 19 March 2011
Beastly, Twilight and B-Movies
The last two films (and I use that term loosely) that I saw were Beastly with Vanessa Hudgens and some guy I don't know, and a very bad B (or c) movie with, well, no one, which was called Mega Shark vs.Giant Octopus, the plot of which should be self explanatory. There's no denying that Mega Shark was TERRIBLE. I was laughing aloud at the hilarity of it. However, I still rate this movie above Beastly. The thing is that B movies know they're B movies, everyone is laughing together, film maker and audience united in bad film making. But films like Beastly which follow in Twilight's footsteps, leave me with the unnerved feeling that somewhere some film maker is sitting smugly back and thinking of all the teenagers and, let's face it, adults, who are forking over their $10.95 to see these badly made films.The problem is on one hand that these films appear to have a moral, but on closer inspection said moral doesn't stand up. Secondly it seems that the film makers seem to believe their audiences are completely gullible. Although, in fact it doesn't matter, because whether they are or aren't they're stilling forking over their 11 bucks. The Twilight series, among it's cinematic problems, is sexist, but instead everyone hails them as models for young girls. I mean, besides the fact that Edward is a creepy boyfriend who controls Bella, there is the fact that Bella has no control over or her own identity or sexuality. Edward won't put out unless they're married, so what's the moral here? That girls have to be chaste? That they should get married at 18 so they can have sex? But back to the issue at hand. Beastly is a reworking of Beauty and the Beast but can't hold a candle to the Disney Classic. More or less it's like so. Kyle is some hot guy who basically has no personality at all and makes fun of 'ugly' people, who in this case are people with tattoos. Now, I know it's been a while since I was in high school but I'm pretty sure tattoos are still cool. Anyway, he is running for president of the Green Committee and his slogan is Embrace the Suck, which, well, WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN? Mary Kate Olsen is a witch with lots of tattoos, well, ok, one, and goth make up so Kyle REALLY hates her. She puts a spell on him and he becomes ugly. Again, he is not really ugly just tattooed and still with his trim figure and those good things. His love interest is Vanessa Hudgens. Let me just pause to say that the opening scenes of this film were so obvious I felt that someone had leaped out of the theatre screen and hit me over the head. A song about vanity plays while we see shots of adverts filled with beautiful people. So Vanessa Hudgens is Lindy. The 'indie' girl. She has no personality but likes coffee, jujubes and sings out loud with her headphones on. She has big headphones so we know that she is listening to Death Cab for Cutie instead of 50cent. Her dad is a drug addict and bought some drugs that he didn't pay for. I didn't know drug dealers had a buy now, pay later plan but anyway, one day he is arguing with his Hispanic drug dealers when he accidentally kills one. Kyle leaps in and somehow convinces crack head dad that Lindy should come live with him for her safety. I guess he is aided by dad's drug addled mind. Anyway so now Lindy, Beastie, the Jamaican maid and Neil Patrick Harris are living together. Do I really have to explain the rest of the film? There is, unfortunately, no musical household appliances but they 'fall in love'. There is no actual romance but a lot of romantic songs so we know they are falling in love and Kyle is learning his lesson. I guess. He doesn't really seem to show more concern for anyone.He wants to be unuglified. Well, ok, he wants Neil Patrick Harris to see and the Jamaican woman to have her kids back but COME ON. What kind of cold hearted sod wouldn't want that for someone they knew? Anyway, they fall in love, he turns back into good looking Kyle and she isn't even bewildered by his transformation, because I guess that happens all the time nowadays. So, it's obvious that the film is crap. But there were other problems. Lindy forgives Kyle's douchebaggery as 'honesty'. The message of vanity is somehow diminished by the fact that everyone, is good looking, and ultimately no one in this film has to step too far out of their comfort zones to actually become good people. I guess my main objection to these films is that the challenges aren't real, in the end, everyone gets what they want without too much effort or suffering. On the bright side, Beastly introduced me to the phrase "fattycakes" so there is that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Great article about shit films, but I want to deviate the discussion to something you mentioned. You said that Twilight doesn't deliver a good message because it's sexist. I was talking the other day with a friend and she said that she preferred femenine fiction to feminist fiction because of the agenda pressure creating unbelievable characters. What do you make of this?
ReplyDeleteWell,I'm not sure what she means is feminine fiction, but if I understand the question correctly, I think that feminist literature and feminine fiction are both in a way, a double edged sword.On one hand I'm a great fan of say, the Georgia Nicolson books by Louise Rennison but more or less these books are about boys, sex and make-up, so are these better than Twilight? I would say, yeah, because there is an agreement between author and reader that recognizes the futility of focusing on these things, in my opinion. Feminine literature is something I enjoy but I think it is often dismissed as not being real literature, 'womens problems' are still not seen as important. I mean even the term Chick lit is degrading.At the same time, I like chick lit because, as your friend said, the characters are more believable. However,I still think that feminine literature has a problem because, at least I've never read a book were a woman becomes a fully actualized person without the help of a man.I don't hate men or romance but I do feel both men and women are complete individuals without a partner. And more significantly there is no place for single women in feminine literature. In Bridget Jones Diary (the film now) she says "well single people in their thirties have scales". Single women are still something to be pitied, which in my opinion, has to go.I think I've said it before but I think that women are trapped because one on hand they're supposed to be feminist and live up to this feminist ideal but on the other hand women are still expected to adhere to traditional roles, even though they are supposed to look down on these traditional roles, even as they live them out. The same goes for men who more than even, I feel have to live up to an impossible standard.I hope this answers your questions. Tell me your opinion.
ReplyDelete